WHY DO WARBLOGGERS MEAN LESS THAN THE LEFT, OR DO THEY?

In the last few weeks there has been a slight wisp of interest in the idea that the anti-Islamic bloodlusters have something to say of actual import. There's even this idea that maybe the law should require them to be taken seriously to other similar writers, that is bloggers who read more than each other's posts. The idea was popular a few years ago, as conservatives lobbied to remove the barriers to their taking over world opinion by banning bloggers, who insist on posting tiresome contradictory facts, from the blogosphere. Fortunately this legislation was smacked down - hard and was never enacted into law.

And since our government passed the First Amendment their speech is already sufficiently protected.

These armchair warriors just don't get it. My partner Jesse, who is a world renowned pundit explains what real patriotic bloggers have to say about fantasy-based unsupported blogviating and how to explain this break with reality. Read the explanation and you'll be able to answer any critic who trots out these tired arguments.

It would be almost like manna from heaven to have the right-wing blogosphere answer this post but I have no time for anyone who hasn't memorized the Communist Manifesto, the complete works of Ayn Rand and every verse of Amazing Grace so I'm forced to evoke my blog rule #276 and turn off the comments so I don't have to be bothered defending my point.